Poland – Ambulances – Supply of two type C road ambulances with 4x4 drive
The subject matter of the contract is the supply of 2 brand-new type “C” road ambulances with 4 x 4 drive for Cieszyńskie Pogotowie Ratunkowe. The ambulances must meet the requirements of the current PN EN 1789 standard or equivalent with regard to amb
Opportunity description
The subject matter of the contract is the supply of 2 brand-new type “C” road ambulances with 4 x 4 drive for Cieszyńskie Pogotowie Ratunkowe. The ambulances must meet the requirements of the current PN EN 1789 standard or equivalent with regard to a type C ambulance. The Contracting Authority requires the supply of brand-new, unused vehicles from the 2026 production year Detailed requirements concerning the subject matter of the contract, the technical description and parameters are set out in Annex No. 2 to the SWZ - Required Parameters Form The Contracting Authority does not allow the submission of partial tenders. The Contracting Authority refrained from dividing the contract into lots because the subject matter of the contract comprises the supply of two brand-new medical ambulances constituting a complete product, consisting of a base vehicle, completed medical bodywork and complete medical equipment, meeting the requirements of applicable laws and standards relevant to road ambulances. The subject matter of the contract constitutes a single, functionally and organisationally coherent task, co-financed from the funds of the Population Protection and Civil Defence Programme for 2025–2026 (Area II). In accordance with the grant agreement, the task includes the purchase of ambulances with 4 x 4 drive together with equipment (electric stretcher, electrically powered cardiac chair, ventilator, infusion pump, electric suction device, defibrillator). Entrusting the performance of the entire contract to one contractor will allow uniform standards of vehicle construction and equipment to be maintained, facilitate their handling, operation and servicing, and ensure consistency of warranty terms and the contractor’s responsibility for the performance of the entire contract. Dividing the contract into lots, involving in particular the separate award of a contract for each ambulance, could result in the delivery of vehicles and equipment differing in the technical solutions applied or the standard of workmanship, as well as necessitate the use of different rules for handling, servicing and exercising warranty rights. Performance of the contract by one contractor also ensures clear responsibility for the proper and timely performance of the entire subject matter of the contract and limits the organisational risk associated with coordinating deliveries carried out by several contractors. The decision not to divide the contract into lots does not result from an intention to restrict competition, but from the nature and functional coherence of the subject matter of the contract, the need to ensure a uniform standard for the ambulances and their equipment, and to ensure efficient and comprehensive performance of the task. The absence of a division of the contract into lots therefore does not restrict fair competition or infringe the principle of proportionality. There are many contractors operating on the market, including small and medium-sized enterprises, with the capacity to comprehensively perform the subject matter of the contract; therefore, the decision not to divide the contract into lots does not limit the possibility of applying for the award of the contract. The Contracting Authority does not allow the submission of variant tenders. The Contracting Authority does not introduce a reservation indicating an obligation for the Contractor to personally perform key parts of the contract. The Contractor may entrust the performance of part of the contract to a subcontractor. The Contracting Authority does not provide for an obligation for the Contractor to conduct a site visit or for the Contractor to inspect documents necessary for the performance of the contract. The Contracting Authority did not conduct preliminary market consultations before launching the procedure The Contracting Authority is not liable for damage caused by the contractor during the performance of the subject matter of the contract. The Contracting Authority does not provide for settlements between the Contracting Authority and the Contractor in foreign currencies. The Contracting Authority does not provide for reimbursement of the costs of participation in the procedure. The Contracting Authority does not require the Contractor to personally perform key tasks pursuant to Art. 60 and Art. 121 of the Pzp Act. The Contracting Authority does not provide for the award of contracts referred to in Art. 214(1)(7) and (8) of the Pzp Act. The purchase in question is financed under the Population Protection and Civil Defence Programme for 2025–2026 (Area II) from the State Budget and the Budget of the Silesian Voivodeship. The Contracting Authority may cancel the contract award procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to financing it have not been granted to it (pursuant to Art. 257 of the uPzp.) All requirements specified in the SWZ documents constitute minimum requirements, compliance with which is mandatory. Failure to meet the above-mentioned minimum requirements will result in rejection of the tender as non-compliant with the contract conditions pursuant to Art. 226(1)(5) of the Pzp Act. The Contracting Authority requires that the offered performance, including all ICT products (information and communication technologies), ICT services and ICT processes used to perform the contract, both as main elements and as components, elements of the environment, service provision or accompanying solutions, must not include: - ICT products, ICT services or ICT processes indicated in the recommendation referred to in Art. 33(4) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, stating their negative impact on the fundamental interest of state security; - an ICT product whose type has been specified in the decision on recognising a supplier as a high-risk supplier, referred to in Art. 67b(15) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, or ICT services or ICT processes specified in that decision. Failure to meet the above requirement will result in rejection of the tender, as applicable, pursuant to Art. 226(1)(17) or (19) of the Pzp Act. 1. The subject matter of the contract is the supply of 2 brand-new type “C” road ambulances with 4 x 4 drive for Cieszyńskie Pogotowie Ratunkowe. 2. The ambulances must meet the requirements of the current PN EN 1789 standard or equivalent with regard to a type C ambulance. 3. The Contracting Authority requires the supply of brand-new, unused vehicles from the 2026 production year 4. Detailed requirements concerning the subject matter of the contract, the technical description and parameters are set out in Annex No. 2 to the SWZ - Required Parameters Form 5. The Contracting Authority does not allow the submission of partial tenders. The Contracting Authority refrained from dividing the contract into lots because the subject matter of the contract comprises the supply of two brand-new medical ambulances constituting a complete product, consisting of a base vehicle, completed medical bodywork and complete medical equipment, meeting the requirements of applicable laws and standards relevant to road ambulances. The subject matter of the contract constitutes a single, functionally and organisationally coherent task, co-financed from the funds of the Population Protection and Civil Defence Programme for 2025–2026 (Area II). In accordance with the grant agreement, the task includes the purchase of ambulances with 4 x 4 drive together with equipment (electric stretcher, electrically powered cardiac chair, ventilator, infusion pump, electric suction device, defibrillator). Entrusting the performance of the entire contract to one contractor will allow uniform standards of vehicle construction and equipment to be maintained, facilitate their handling, operation and servicing, and ensure consistency of warranty terms and the contractor’s responsibility for the performance of the entire contract. Dividing the contract into lots, involving in particular the separate award of a contract for each ambulance, could result in the delivery of vehicles and equipment differing in the technical solutions applied or the standard of workmanship, as well as necessitate the use of different rules for handling, servicing and exercising warranty rights. Performance of the contract by one contractor also ensures clear responsibility for the proper and timely performance of the entire subject matter of the contract and limits the organisational risk associated with coordinating deliveries carried out by several contractors. The decision not to divide the contract into lots does not result from an intention to restrict competition, but from the nature and functional coherence of the subject matter of the contract, the need to ensure a uniform standard for the ambulances and their equipment, and to ensure efficient and comprehensive performance of the task. The absence of a division of the contract into lots therefore does not restrict fair competition or infringe the principle of proportionality. There are many contractors operating on the market, including small and medium-sized enterprises, with the capacity to comprehensively perform the subject matter of the contract; therefore, the decision not to divide the contract into lots does not limit the possibility of applying for the award of the contract. 6. The Contracting Authority does not allow the submission of variant tenders. 7. The Contracting Authority does not introduce a reservation indicating an obligation for the Contractor to personally perform key parts of the contract. The Contractor may entrust the performance of part of the contract to a subcontractor. 8. The Contracting Authority does not provide for an obligation for the Contractor to conduct a site visit or for the Contractor to inspect documents necessary for the performance of the contract. 9. The Contracting Authority did not conduct preliminary market consultations before launching the procedure 10. The Contracting Authority is not liable for damage caused by the contractor during the performance of the subject matter of the contract. 11. The Contracting Authority does not provide for settlements between the Contracting Authority and the Contractor in foreign currencies. 12. The Contracting Authority does not provide for reimbursement of the costs of participation in the procedure. 13. The Contracting Authority does not require the Contractor to personally perform key tasks pursuant to Art. 60 and Art. 121 of the Pzp Act. 14. The Contracting Authority does not provide for the award of contracts referred to in Art. 214(1)(7) and (8) of the Pzp Act. 15. The purchase in question is financed under the Population Protection and Civil Defence Programme for 2025–2026 (Area II) from the State Budget and the Budget of the Silesian Voivodeship. 16. The Contracting Authority may cancel the contract award procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to financing it have not been granted to it (pursuant to Art. 257 of the uPzp.) 17. All requirements specified in the SWZ documents constitute minimum requirements, compliance with which is mandatory. Failure to meet the above-mentioned minimum requirements will result in rejection of the tender as non-compliant with the contract conditions pursuant to Art. 226(1)(5) of the Pzp Act. 18. The Contracting Authority requires that the offered performance, including all ICT products (information and communication technologies), ICT services and ICT processes used to perform the contract, both as main elements and as components, elements of the environment, service provision or accompanying solutions, must not include: - ICT products, ICT services or ICT processes indicated in the recommendation referred to in Art. 33(4) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, stating their negative impact on the fundamental interest of state security; - an ICT product whose type has been specified in the decision on recognising a supplier as a high-risk supplier, referred to in Art. 67b(15) of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, or ICT services or ICT processes specified in that decision. Failure to meet the above requirement will result in rejection of the tender, as applicable, pursuant to Art. 226(1)(17) or (19) of the Pzp Act4 Procedure: open. Review the original TED notice for the complete requirement, lots, amendments and attachments.
Business details are available after sign in
Codes, capabilities, evidence, buyer details and marketplace actions are withheld from the public HTML and API response.