Poland – Computer servers – Supply of computing servers for the IT Centre of the University of Gdańsk with an option right.

Opportunity description

1. The subject matter of the contract is the supply of computing servers, hereinafter referred to as the “equipment”, for the IT Centre of the University of Gdańsk with an option right: 2. Common Procurement Vocabulary (CPV) classification code: 48822000-6 (computer servers). 3. The contract includes the supply of computing servers in the following quantities: 1) for the basic contract: server A – 1 unit, server B – 1 unit, 2) for the contract covered by the option right: server A – a maximum of 1 unit, server B – a maximum of 1 unit. 4. The Contracting Authority may exercise the option right, consisting in increasing the quantity of equipment ordered under the basic contract, according to the rules and procedure described below: 1) The Contracting Authority provides for the possibility of commissioning the Contractor to perform a contract under the option right, within the performance period of the basic contract referred to in Chapter IV subpoint 1, by submitting to the Contractor electronically an appropriate declaration of intent to exercise the option, specifying the quantity and type of equipment indicated by the Contractor in the tender form – Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ, 2) the value of the equipment ordered under the option right will be consistent with the unit prices indicated by the Contractor in the tender form – Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ, 3) performance period for the contract covered by the option right: up to 90 days from the date on which the Contracting Authority places the order covered by the option right, 4) exercising the option right does not constitute an amendment to the contract. The Contractor shall have no claim against the Contracting Authority if the Contracting Authority does not exercise the option right. The decision to perform the contract covered by the option right constitutes a unilateral entitlement of the Contracting Authority, 5) the provisions of the draft contract – Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ concerning the basic contract apply to the contract covered by the option right unless otherwise stipulated. 5. A detailed description of the subject matter of the contract is set out in Appendix No. 6 to the SWZ – Description of the subject matter of the contract. 6. Place of delivery of the equipment: IT Centre of the University of Gdańsk, ul. prof. Marii Janion 7, 80-309 Gdańsk. 7. The Contracting Authority requires a warranty for the equipment for a period of 36 months. Details concerning the warranty are contained in § 7 of the Draft contract – Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 8. In the description of the subject matter of the contract, constituting Appendix No. 6 to the SWZ, the Contracting Authority described the requirements concerning management systems relating to the production process of the offered equipment by reference to the standards indicated in items No. 14 of Tables 1 and 2 of the description of the subject matter of the contract. In every case in which these standards have been indicated in the SWZ, including in the appendices to the SWZ, it shall be understood that such an indication is accompanied by the words “or equivalent”. Thus, the Contracting Authority permits solutions equivalent to the standards indicated in items No. 14 of Tables 1 and 2 of the description of the subject matter of the contract, in accordance with Art. 101(4) and (5) Pzp. Equivalence shall be understood to mean that the offered equipment originates from production covered by an implemented and current management system that meets, to an equivalent degree, the requirements set out in items No. 14 of Tables 1 and 2 of the description of the subject matter of the contract. The equivalent solutions used must correspond, in their type and scope, to the objectives served by the standards referred to in items No. 14 of Tables 1 and 2 of the description of the subject matter of the contract. 9. Due to the fact that various equivalent proposals are permitted, the Contractor is required to verify and treat all solutions as interconnected. Demonstrating equivalence, i.e. meeting to an equivalent degree the requirements specified by the Contracting Authority in the description of the subject matter of the contract, is the responsibility of the Contractor. If equipment originating from production covered by a management system compliant with an equivalent standard or another solution equivalent to the standards indicated in items No. 14 of Tables 1 and 2 of the description of the subject matter of the contract is offered, the Contractor is obliged to indicate this solution in point 6 of the Tender Form, constituting Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ, provide information about the equivalent solution offered, justification of its equivalence, and evidence confirming equivalence. The Contracting Authority will not reject the Contractor’s tender solely because the offered equipment does not originate from production covered by management systems compliant with the standards indicated in items No. 14 of Tables 1 and 2 of the description of the subject matter of the contract, provided that the Contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Art. 104–107 Pzp, that the proposed solutions meet, to an equivalent degree, the requirements specified by the Contracting Authority in items No. 14 of Tables 1 and 2 of the description of the subject matter of the contract (Art. 101(5) Pzp). 10. After signing the contract, the Contracting Authority intends to apply for a 0% VAT rate pursuant to Art. 83(14)(1) of the Act of 11 March 2004 on tax on goods and services (consolidated text: Journal of Laws of 2025, item 775, as amended). Procedure: open. Review the original TED notice for the complete requirement, lots, amendments and attachments.