Poland – Medical equipment – Supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care

Opportunity description

1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendices Nos. 2.1 to 2.21 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract.3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań.4. The Contracting Authority permits the submission of partial tenders. The subject of the contract has been divided into parts (packages). A tender may be submitted for one, several or all parts of the contract.5. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 6. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 7. The minimum guaranteed level of the contract value for which the Contracting Authority undertakes to place orders is: 100% of the contract value. 8. The Contracting Authority does not permit the submission of variant tenders.9. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”.10. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law.11. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 12. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 13. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ.14. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the description of the subject of the contract refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree.15. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the description of the subject of the contract refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.1 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.2 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.3 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.4 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.5 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.6 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.7 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.8 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the construction work, supply or service meets the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are intended solely to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. 1. THE SUBJECT OF THE CONTRACT is the supply of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care. 2. The subject of the contract has been described in detail in Appendix No. 1 to the SWZ – Tender Form, in Appendix No. 2.9 to the SWZ – List of required quality and technical parameters, and in Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ – Draft Contractual Provisions, which specify the quantity and description of the subject of the contract. 3. The contract is co-financed under the agreement for co-financing the Project entitled “Modernisation of premises and purchase of equipment for Specialist Outpatient Care at the Dr Roman Ostrzycki Regional Integrated Hospital in Konin”, No. FEWP.05.03-IZ.00-0011/24-00, under: Priority 05: European Funds Supporting Social Infrastructure for the Residents of Wielkopolska (ERDF), Measure FEWP.05.03 Healthcare Infrastructure, European Funds for Wielkopolska Programme 2021-2027, and grant agreement No. DZ- IV-A/117/W/2025/FEWP concluded on 23 July 2025, as subsequently amended, with the Wielkopolskie Voivodeship, with its registered office at UMWW in Poznań. 4. The subject of the contract shall be delivered at the Contractor’s expense and risk and using the Contractor’s transport. 5. The conditions for performance of the Subject of the Contract are also set out in the Draft Contractual Provisions constituting Appendix No. 5 to the SWZ. 6. If the OPZ refers to trademarks, patents or origin, a source or a particular process that characterises products or services provided by a specific contractor, this shall be understood to mean that each such reference is accompanied by the expression “or equivalent”. 7. By “or equivalent”, the Contracting Authority understands the offering of materials guaranteeing performance of the task in accordance with the Contracting Authority’s requirements and ensuring technical parameters no worse than those stipulated in the SWZ. The use of equivalent solutions may not result in deterioration of the characteristics of the subject of the contract compared with those provided for in the original documentation, any change in price, or any breach of the law. 8. Any product or manufacturer names included in the OPZ have been used only by way of example, i.e. to illustrate requirements that could not be described using sufficiently precise and comprehensible terms. Any indicated names of products and their manufacturers are not intended to infringe the principle of fair competition and equal treatment of contractors. Wherever they are indicated, they shall be read as being accompanied by the term “or equivalent”. 9. The Contracting Authority permits the supply of products or equipment equivalent to those in the OPZ, meaning that the offered subject of the contract shall have the same or higher technical, quality, functional and operational parameters as those indicated in the OPZ. 10. The trademarks, proper names, etc. indicated in the OPZ (if any) constitute solely a quality benchmark concerning the subject of the contract. In all cases where, due to the specification of the subject of the contract, names of products, equipment or materials have been indicated, the use of equivalent products, equipment or materials is permitted, i.e. all materials referred to by name in the description of the subject of the contract serve solely to define the standard and may be replaced by others with operational and quality parameters that are no worse. In the case of tenders containing equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority shall verify them in terms of compliance with the requirements of the individual technical-requirement items contained in the appendices to the SWZ. The Contractor is obliged to prove in the tender the equivalence of the assortment offered. The burden of proving equivalence rests with the Contractor. The Contracting Authority shall not recognise equivalent solutions if they have quality requirements lower than the minimum requirements indicated in the appendices to the SWZ. 11. Pursuant to Art. 101(5) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 101(1)(2) and (3) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender solely because the construction works, supplies or services offered do not comply with the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems to which the description of the subject of the contract refers, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject of the contract to an equivalent degree. 12. Pursuant to Art. 101(6) of the Pzp Act: where the OPZ refers to performance or functionality requirements referred to in Art. 101(1)(1) of the Pzp Act, the contracting authority may not reject a tender complying with a Polish Standard transposing a European standard, standards of other Member States of the European Economic Area transposing European standards, a European technical assessment, a common technical specification, an international standard or a technical reference system established by a European standardisation body, if those standards, technical assessments, specifications and technical reference systems concern the performance or functionality requirements specified by the contracting authority, provided that the contractor proves in the tender, in particular by means of the subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts.