Poland – Playground equipment – Playground at Alfreda Wierusza-Kowalskiego Street in Suwałki

Opportunity description

1. The subject matter of the contract is the task entitled “Playground at Alfreda Wierusza-Kowalskiego Street in Suwałki”, consisting of the delivery and installation of playground equipment, in accordance with the detailed description of the subject matter of the contract contained in Annex No. 2 to the SWZ. 2. Pursuant to Art. 101 sec. 4 of the Act, wherever the subject matter of the contract is described by means of standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems, the Contracting Authority permits solutions equivalent to those described. Furthermore, it shall be assumed that all such references are accompanied by the words "or equivalent". Demonstrating the equivalence of the offered solution pursuant to Art. 101 sec. 5 of the Act and under the rules specified therein rests with the Contractor; in such a case, the Contractor is obliged to prove, by attaching to the tender the appropriate subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract to an equivalent degree. 3. Where trademarks have been used in the OPZ documentation (description of the subject matter of the contract), this means that they are provided as examples and define only the minimum expected quality parameters and the required standard. The Contractor may use equivalent materials or equipment, but with similar or better technical and quality parameters, the use of which will in no way adversely affect the proper functioning of the solutions adopted in the OPZ documentation. A Contractor who uses equivalent equipment or materials will be obliged to demonstrate during the performance of the contract that the materials and equipment used by it meet the requirements specified by the Contracting Authority. 4. The use of a label in the OPZ documentation means that the Contracting Authority accepts all labels confirming that the supplies or services concerned meet requirements equivalent to those of the label specified by the Contracting Authority. Where, for reasons beyond its control, the Contractor cannot obtain the label specified by the Contracting Authority or an equivalent label, the Contracting Authority shall, within a time limit set by it, accept other corresponding subject-matter evidence, in particular the manufacturer’s documentation, provided that the Contractor proves that the supplies or services to be performed by it meet the requirements of the specified label or the specified requirements indicated by the Contracting Authority. 5. The use in the design documentation of a requirement to possess a certificate issued by a conformity assessment body or a report on tests carried out by that body as evidence confirming conformity with the requirements or characteristics specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract, tender evaluation criteria or contract performance conditions means that the Contracting Authority also accepts certificates issued by other equivalent conformity assessment bodies. The Contracting Authority also accepts other appropriate evidence, in particular the manufacturer’s technical documentation, where the Contractor concerned has no access to the certificates or test reports or no possibility of obtaining them within the relevant time limit, provided that this lack of access cannot be attributed to the Contractor concerned and that the Contractor proves that the supplies and services performed by it meet the requirements or criteria specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract, the tender evaluation criteria or the requirements related to contract performance. 6. Where the description is made by means of standards, equivalent solutions shall be deemed to be solutions that ensure compliance with the minimum requirements specified in the standard at a level no worse than that described in the relevant standards. In the case of standards referred to in the SWZ (unless specified in detail), current standards shall be understood. In other cases (description of the subject matter of the contract by means of technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems), a product, material or system with technical, functional and quality parameters no worse than those listed in the description of the subject matter of the contract shall be considered equivalent. 7. Whenever the subject matter of the contract in this SWZ has been defined by indicating trademarks, patents, origin, etc., the Contracting Authority’s intention was to present the "type" of goods meeting the Contracting Authority’s requirements. Furthermore, it shall be assumed that all such indications are accompanied by the words "or equivalent". Accordingly, the Contractor may offer an equivalent solution that guarantees parameters and technical, quality and functional standards no worse than those indicated in the SWZ. A Contractor relying on solutions equivalent to those described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate in the submitted tender that the supplies it offers meet the requirements specified by the Contracting Authority. 8. The Contractor is obliged to produce and install 1 information board measuring 80 x 120 cm, to be erected when performance of the contract commences. The Contractor is obliged to agree upon the design and content of the board and its installation location with the Contracting Authority. (the provision will remain if the Contracting Authority receives funding). 9. The Contracting Authority states that it is applying for funding for the task from the budget of the Podlaskie Voivodeship under the Municipalities and Counties Support Fund in 2026 and, pursuant to Art. 257 of the Pzp Act, may cancel the contract award procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract are not awarded to it. 10. The Contracting Authority states that, pursuant to Art. 139 of the Act, it will examine and evaluate the tenders and then conduct the eligibility assessment of the Contractor whose tender received the highest evaluation with respect to the absence of grounds for exclusion and fulfillment of the conditions for participation in the procedure. AMENDMENTS to the contract are specified in Annex No. 8 to the SWZ (due to the limitations of the contract notice, the full text is in the annex to the SWZ. 1. The subject matter of the contract is the task entitled “Playground at Alfreda Wierusza-Kowalskiego Street in Suwałki”, consisting of the delivery and installation of playground equipment, in accordance with the detailed description of the subject matter of the contract contained in Annex No. 2 to the SWZ. 2. Pursuant to Art. 101 sec. 4 of the Act, wherever the subject matter of the contract is described by means of standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems, the Contracting Authority permits solutions equivalent to those described. Furthermore, it shall be assumed that all such references are accompanied by the words "or equivalent". Demonstrating the equivalence of the offered solution pursuant to Art. 101 sec. 5 of the Act and under the rules specified therein rests with the Contractor; in such a case, the Contractor is obliged to prove, by attaching to the tender the appropriate subject-matter evidence referred to in Arts. 104-107 of the Pzp Act, that the proposed solutions meet the requirements specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract to an equivalent degree. 3. Where trademarks have been used in the OPZ documentation (description of the subject matter of the contract), this means that they are provided as examples and define only the minimum expected quality parameters and the required standard. The Contractor may use equivalent materials or equipment, but with similar or better technical and quality parameters, the use of which will in no way adversely affect the proper functioning of the solutions adopted in the OPZ documentation. A Contractor who uses equivalent equipment or materials will be obliged to demonstrate during the performance of the contract that the materials and equipment used by it meet the requirements specified by the Contracting Authority. 4. The use of a label in the OPZ documentation means that the Contracting Authority accepts all labels confirming that the supplies or services concerned meet requirements equivalent to those of the label specified by the Contracting Authority. Where, for reasons beyond its control, the Contractor cannot obtain the label specified by the Contracting Authority or an equivalent label, the Contracting Authority shall, within a time limit set by it, accept other corresponding subject-matter evidence, in particular the manufacturer’s documentation, provided that the Contractor proves that the supplies or services to be performed by it meet the requirements of the specified label or the specified requirements indicated by the Contracting Authority. 5. The use in the design documentation of a requirement to possess a certificate issued by a conformity assessment body or a report on tests carried out by that body as evidence confirming conformity with the requirements or characteristics specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract, tender evaluation criteria or contract performance conditions means that the Contracting Authority also accepts certificates issued by other equivalent conformity assessment bodies. The Contracting Authority also accepts other appropriate evidence, in particular the manufacturer’s technical documentation, where the Contractor concerned has no access to the certificates or test reports or no possibility of obtaining them within the relevant time limit, provided that this lack of access cannot be attributed to the Contractor concerned and that the Contractor proves that the supplies and services performed by it meet the requirements or criteria specified in the description of the subject matter of the contract, the tender evaluation criteria or the requirements related to contract performance. 6. Where the description is made by means of standards, equivalent solutions shall be deemed to be solutions that ensure compliance with the minimum requirements specified in the standard at a level no worse than that described in the relevant standards. In the case of standards referred to in the SWZ (unless specified in detail), current standards shall be understood. In other cases (description of the subject matter of the contract by means of technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems), a product, material or system with technical, functional and quality parameters no worse than those listed in the description of the subject matter of the contract shall be considered equivalent. 7. Whenever the subject matter of the contract in this SWZ has been defined by indicating trademarks, patents, origin, etc., the Contracting Authority’s intention was to present the "type" of goods meeting the Contracting Authority’s requirements. Furthermore, it shall be assumed that all such indications are accompanied by the words "or equivalent". Accordingly, the Contractor may offer an equivalent solution that guarantees parameters and technical, quality and functional standards no worse than those indicated in the SWZ. A Contractor relying on solutions equivalent to those described by the Contracting Authority is obliged to indicate in the submitted tender that the supplies it offers meet the requirements specified by the Contracting Authority. 8. The Contractor is obliged to produce and install 1 information board measuring 80 x 120 cm, to be erected when performance of the contract commences. The Contractor is obliged to agree upon the design and content of the board and its installation location with the Contracting Authority. (the provision will remain if the Contracting Authority receives funding). 9. The Contracting Authority states that it is applying for funding for the task from the budget of the Podlaskie Voivodeship under the Municipalities and Counties Support Fund in 2026 and, pursuant to Art. 257 of the Pzp Act, may cancel the contract award procedure if the public funds that the Contracting Authority intended to allocate to finance all or part of the contract are not awarded to it. 10. The subject matter of the contract must meet the minimum requirements for ensuring accessibility to persons with special needs referred to in the Act of 19 July 2019 on ensuring accessibility to persons with special needs, in accordance with the description contained in the documentation describing the subject matter of the contract (Annex No. 2 to the SWZ). In particular, these requirements include structural and functional solutions enabling the playground to be used by children and caregivers with mobility disabilities Procedure: open. Review the original TED notice for the complete requirement, lots, amendments and attachments.